Brian Beutler: “Ahead of Thursday’s Supreme Court argument over Donald Trump’s claim to immunity for everything he did while president, the New York Times published a stirring call for the Supreme Court to rule against Trump with haste and in no uncertain terms—so that Trump can’t tee up a new

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will consider “one of the most pressing questions to emerge since they eliminated the federal constitutional right to an abortion two years ago: Under what circumstances can women with serious pregnancy complications obtain abortions in states where the procedure is

“The Supreme Court seemed ready to let cities crack down on homeless encampments, after Monday arguments in which conservative justices questioned lower-court findings that ordinances restricting sleeping in public amounted to unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment,” the Wall Street

“The Supreme Court’s historic consideration of Donald Trump’s claim of immunity from criminal charges for trying to overturn the 2020 election is running up against a stark reality: The calendar is as important as the Constitution,” Bloomberg reports. “The April 25 argument gives Special Counsel

Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) writes in the New York Times that if the Supreme Court does not resolve the issue of presidential immunity “quickly and decisively,” it will have a “profoundly negative impact” on the country. Said Cheney: “If delay prevents this Trump case from being tried this year,